This is an actual headline from the New York Times: “Do Women Have What It Takes To Lead?” Leaving aside for a moment the head-bonking trolliness of such a headline, it bears pointing out that the New York Times is CURRENTLY LED BY A WOMAN. Jill Abramson is the executive editor of the NYT and the first woman in the paper’s storied history to hold that position. In her own words, she is definitely not chopped liver

The only good thing about this is the delicious irony of a banner ad for “Ann” directly above it. God, I’d love to see that anonymous headline writer TRY to get that question past Ann Richards. 

Update: 

Thanks to some energetic and outraged tweets, NYT Public Editor Margaret Sullivan has addressed the issue with a delicious headline: “Is There Really Room To Debate Whether Women Can Lead?” Ha. 

I’m pleased to report that CTR & TheLi.st were key catalysts in getting to this point. After Stephanie Goodell & Callie Schweitzer posted on our  internal listserv, I grabbed the screenshot above and sent it out into the world. Elizabeth Plank picked it up at PolicyMic and Harvard Business Review editor Sarah Green tweeted it to the attention of Margaret Sullivan, whom Sarah and I urged to address it in her column. And lo! She did

Love this from Sarah Green:  

“If you substituted any other demographic group, I think there would have been an a-ha moment by an editor that this wasn’t such a good idea,” she told me.

So true. 

Loved this significantly less from ‘Room For Debate’ editor Susan Ellingwood: 

Raising a provocative question is our way of starting an interesting discussion. That title starts a productive conversation about gender stereotypes and leadership – even if, in the end, the consensus among the debaters is “yes, women do have what it takes.” Each post explored the question from a different angle. And as readers’ reactions show, the pieces sparked a conversation about an important topic. That’s our goal.

What struck all of us here at Room for Debate is that the publicity around Sheryl Sandberg’s book promotes an aggressive self-centered “male” approach to leadership, and yet there are many studies that show that team-building and consensus, seen as a “female,” approach to leadership can be more effective.

Ugh. First of all, do not pat yourself on the back for being provocative. Perhaps you’d like to wonder aloud about Barack Obama’s birth certificate? Give me a break. There is “provocative” and there is “open question” and this is neither. It’s just trolling. End of story. 

Second, “the publicity around Sheryl Sandberg’s book” does not at ALL promote an “aggressively self-centered ‘male’ approach to leadership.” WTF?!?! That is just wrong. As a member of Sheryl’s Lean In launch team I can’t think of any of the “publicity” around the book that answers to that description. Nor the site. Nor the book. Did Ellingwood even read it? Only one of the so-called “debators” even referenced Sandberg -  or the data in the book. I disagree vehemently with her characterization here, and DEFINITELY disagree with it as even the remotest justification for that stupid headline. 

That stupid headline, which still remains on the NYT site. With a LOT of disgusted comments (this one is my favorite). Still, encouraging to see it addressed and even more encouraging to know it was catalyzed by the CTR community. We are the butterfly flapping in the rainforest of the internet! Or something. Either way, cool. 

Is There Really Room To Debate Whether Women Can Lead? [NYT]

The New York Times Asks “Do Women Have What It Takes to Lead?” Uh, Yes [PolicyMic]

Related:

Changing Times: Jill Abramson Takes Charge of the Gray Lady [ New Yorker]

Ann, A Play About A Woman Who Led [Ann]

On Adria Richards & SendGrid

You don’t have to agree with Adria Richards’ actions at PyCon to be appalled by the sorry mess it’s become.

SendGrid made a massive mistake here - presumably they hired Adria Richards based on her record and experience. Presumably they interviewed her. Presumably they knew she had a blog and that it was called, “But You’re A Girl” - which presumably they understood to mean she’d be writing about her experiences being a woman in technology (presumably with a little edge). And presumably they’d done a little research into her methods. They hired her as a developer evangelist which means that they were presumably on board with the perspective from which she’d evangelize. And up until two days ago, they got a lot of goodwill from it

Who knows what went on in the minds of SendGrid management. But it seemed like an awfully kneejerk move, a clear attempt at appeasement to the troll armies. And however you may disagree with how Adria handled the incident at PyCon - and there is ample room for disagreement - the reaction against her specifically was wildly disproportionate, explicitly gendered, actively threatening and puts all the blame on her. PyCon, which responded to her tweet and immediately removed the men in question, has gotten off pretty unscathed. (Perhaps because its Code of Conduct and Attendee Procedure For Handling Harassment both supported its decision.)( Update: While PyCon did pull the men out of the conference at that time, they were not kicked out of the conference.) PlayHaven, which summarily fired its employee, has not received such umbrage. This demand letter from Anonymous is, shall we say, fairly extreme. 
And yet SendGrid complied, letting Richards go. Company CEO Jim Franklin claimed in a blog post that it was because Richards behaved inappropriately in tweeting the photo and accusation. He drew this distinction: 
“We understand that Adria believed the conduct to be inappropriate and support her right to report the incident to PyCon personnel. To be clear, SendGrid supports the right to report inappropriate behavior, whenever and wherever it occurs. What we do not support was how she reported the conduct.”
Fair enough, but that all happened Sunday, and Richards blogged it Monday. Things began swelling Tuesday, but it wasn’t until late Wednesday that SendGrid became directly implicated by DDOS attacks. The firing was announced Thursday. So there is something logically inconsistent here. It seems clear that SendGrid and Franklin were aware of Richards’ conduct as the situation unfolded, yet the decision to fire her *only* came after the attacks. (And indeed, by Franklin’s own admission Richards abided by the PyCon Code of Conduct incident at the time, since he notes that the code was since updated.) 
We live in a world now where everything is tweeted and Instagrammed and tagged and now, God help us, Vined. Calling out grievances over Twitter has become an industry norm. (Just ask any airline.) So on Sunday or Monday, even if SendGrid may have thought it was an extreme way for Adria to have dealt with the situation, it still would have been hard to argue that it was contextually inappropriate. (The PyCon code of conduct affirmed confidentiality for those reporting incidents, not for those being reported.) 

So SendGrid - and Franklin - are being seriously intellectually dishonest here. They fired a female employee for speaking up in about feeling uncomfortable within a specific professional environment, in a manner which - like it or not! - was consistent with the rules and regulations of that environment. That’s not ‘supporting the right to report inappropriate behavior, wherever and whenever it occurs.’ That’s a warning shot for women not to speak out, pure and simple. 

Because Adria made a judgment call and look how crazily she got burned. Anyone who thinks that women won’t think twice about speaking up forcefully about this stuff is kidding themselves. Maybe not in the clear-cut situations, but in those blurry wait-maybe-it’s-me-should-I-just-learn-to-take-a-joke?-everyone-else-is-laughing situations that happen so often in rooms dominated by dudes, in an industry that often chides women to  just get over the booth babe thing, learn to take a joke, stop complaining. It’s really easy to take a big swashbuckling stand on the easy, clear-cut cases. But this is much more nuanced and cumulative - death by a thousand cuts.  
Adria doesn’t represent all women in tech - that is a huge, sprawling, diverse range of people across what is now a massive and diffuse industry. But the hateful reaction to her has been breathtaking, and frightening, and unequivocally gendered. You cannot brush off repeated threats of rape. And honestly, check out a comments section on this stuff once in a while. (This is also running on Business Insider, and I don’t plan on checking the comments section there.) It’s when things blow up that it becomes impossible not to notice that women get treated scarily, threateningly and very specifically worse
And THAT’s what SendGrid capitulated to. Their actions have been cowardly and intellectually dishonest. They could learn something from the employee they just cut loose. 
(Reblogged from cbracy)

makerswomen:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on women taking over the Supreme Court!

Happy 80th Birthday, Justice Ginsburg!

Watch Ruth Bader Ginsburg tell her amazing story.

RBG FTW.

(Reblogged from makerswomen)

The ladies of the #SXSWomen #PowerPanel: @cmwalla @merici @kathleendwarner @kayjaypartay & your host, @rachelsklar #changetheratio

annfriedman:

aminatou:

legit hope she keeps that arm flex feeling about herself forever and ever

forever.

+1

(Reblogged from annfriedman)

nbcsnl:

Happy International Women’s Day!

To help celebrate, we’ve compiled some of our favorite moments from the SNL ladies throughout the years!

(Source: instagram.com)

(Reblogged from curtinly)